mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2026-07-22 01:17:57 +00:00
Close #13239 Implement the same behaviour as the gitea_uploader ### Tests for Go changes (can be removed for JavaScript changes) - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [X] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. ### Documentation - [X] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/13257 Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
565 lines
18 KiB
Go
565 lines
18 KiB
Go
// Copyright 2019 The Gitea Authors.
|
|
// All rights reserved.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
|
|
|
package pull
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"errors"
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"io"
|
|
|
|
"forgejo.org/models/db"
|
|
issues_model "forgejo.org/models/issues"
|
|
repo_model "forgejo.org/models/repo"
|
|
user_model "forgejo.org/models/user"
|
|
"forgejo.org/modules/git"
|
|
"forgejo.org/modules/gitrepo"
|
|
"forgejo.org/modules/log"
|
|
"forgejo.org/modules/optional"
|
|
"forgejo.org/modules/setting"
|
|
"forgejo.org/modules/util"
|
|
notify_service "forgejo.org/services/notify"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// ErrDismissRequestOnClosedPR represents an error when an user tries to dismiss a review associated to a closed or merged PR.
|
|
type ErrDismissRequestOnClosedPR struct{}
|
|
|
|
// IsErrDismissRequestOnClosedPR checks if an error is an ErrDismissRequestOnClosedPR.
|
|
func IsErrDismissRequestOnClosedPR(err error) bool {
|
|
_, ok := err.(ErrDismissRequestOnClosedPR)
|
|
return ok
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (err ErrDismissRequestOnClosedPR) Error() string {
|
|
return "can't dismiss a review associated to a closed or merged PR"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (err ErrDismissRequestOnClosedPR) Unwrap() error {
|
|
return util.ErrPermissionDenied
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// checkInvalidation checks if the line of code comment got changed by another commit.
|
|
// If the line got changed the comment is going to be invalidated.
|
|
func checkInvalidation(ctx context.Context, c *issues_model.Comment, repo *repo_model.Repository, newCommitID string) error {
|
|
reverseBlame, err := c.ResolveCurrentLine(ctx, repo, newCommitID)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
log.Warn("ResolveCurrentLine failed: %s", err.Error())
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
if reverseBlame.CommitID != newCommitID {
|
|
c.Invalidated = true
|
|
return issues_model.UpdateCommentInvalidate(ctx, c)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// For multi-line comments, check additional lines in the range
|
|
if c.ExtraLinesCount > 0 {
|
|
invalidated, err := checkMultiLineInvalidation(ctx, c, repo, newCommitID)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
log.Warn("checkMultiLineInvalidation failed: %s", err.Error())
|
|
} else if invalidated {
|
|
c.Invalidated = true
|
|
return issues_model.UpdateCommentInvalidate(ctx, c)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// checkMultiLineInvalidation checks if any additional line in a multi-line comment range
|
|
// has been changed. Returns true if the comment should be invalidated.
|
|
// Uses cached results via Comment.CheckLineRangeValid.
|
|
func checkMultiLineInvalidation(ctx context.Context, c *issues_model.Comment, repo *repo_model.Repository, newCommitID string) (bool, error) {
|
|
valid, err := c.CheckLineRangeValid(ctx, repo, newCommitID)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return false, err
|
|
}
|
|
return !valid, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// InvalidateCodeComments will lookup the prs for code comments which got invalidated by change
|
|
func InvalidateCodeComments(ctx context.Context, prs issues_model.PullRequestList, doer *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository, newCommitID string) error {
|
|
if len(prs) == 0 {
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
issueIDs := prs.GetIssueIDs()
|
|
|
|
codeComments, err := db.Find[issues_model.Comment](ctx, issues_model.FindCommentsOptions{
|
|
ListOptions: db.ListOptionsAll,
|
|
Type: issues_model.CommentTypeCode,
|
|
Invalidated: optional.Some(false),
|
|
IssueIDs: issueIDs,
|
|
})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("find code comments: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
for _, comment := range codeComments {
|
|
if err := checkInvalidation(ctx, comment, repo, newCommitID); err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ValidateCodeCommentLineRange validates the extra_lines_count of a (multi-line) code comment: it must
|
|
// not be negative and the resulting range must not span more than setting.UI.MaxCodeCommentLines lines
|
|
// (0 = no limit). It is the single source of truth shared by the web and API creation handlers.
|
|
func ValidateCodeCommentLineRange(extraLinesCount int64) error {
|
|
if extraLinesCount < 0 {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("extra_lines_count must be >= 0")
|
|
}
|
|
if setting.UI.MaxCodeCommentLines > 0 && extraLinesCount+1 > int64(setting.UI.MaxCodeCommentLines) {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("a code comment may span at most %d lines", setting.UI.MaxCodeCommentLines)
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CreateCodeComment creates a comment on the code line
|
|
func CreateCodeComment(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, gitRepo *git.Repository,
|
|
issue *issues_model.Issue, line, extraLinesCount int64, content, treePath string, pendingReview bool,
|
|
replyReviewID int64, beforeCommitID, latestCommitID string, attachments []string,
|
|
) (*issues_model.Comment, error) {
|
|
var (
|
|
existsReview bool
|
|
err error
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// CreateCodeComment() is used for:
|
|
// - Single comments
|
|
// - Comments that are part of a review
|
|
// - Comments that reply to an existing review
|
|
|
|
if !pendingReview && replyReviewID != 0 {
|
|
// It's not part of a review; maybe a reply to a review comment or a single comment.
|
|
// Check if there are reviews for that line already; if there are, this is a reply
|
|
if existsReview, err = issues_model.ReviewExists(ctx, issue, treePath, line); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Comments that are replies don't require a review header to show up in the issue view
|
|
if !pendingReview && existsReview {
|
|
if err = issue.LoadRepo(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
comment, err := CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID(ctx,
|
|
doer,
|
|
issue.Repo,
|
|
issue,
|
|
content,
|
|
treePath,
|
|
beforeCommitID,
|
|
latestCommitID,
|
|
line,
|
|
extraLinesCount,
|
|
replyReviewID,
|
|
attachments,
|
|
)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mentions, err := issues_model.FindAndUpdateIssueMentions(ctx, issue, doer, comment.Content)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
notify_service.CreateIssueComment(ctx, doer, issue.Repo, issue, comment, mentions)
|
|
|
|
return comment, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
review, err := issues_model.GetCurrentReview(ctx, doer, issue)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
if !issues_model.IsErrReviewNotExist(err) {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if review, err = issues_model.CreateReview(ctx, issues_model.CreateReviewOptions{
|
|
Type: issues_model.ReviewTypePending,
|
|
Reviewer: doer,
|
|
Issue: issue,
|
|
Official: false,
|
|
CommitID: latestCommitID,
|
|
}); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
comment, err := CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID(ctx,
|
|
doer,
|
|
issue.Repo,
|
|
issue,
|
|
content,
|
|
treePath,
|
|
beforeCommitID,
|
|
latestCommitID,
|
|
line,
|
|
extraLinesCount,
|
|
review.ID,
|
|
attachments,
|
|
)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !pendingReview && !existsReview {
|
|
// Submit the review we've just created so the comment shows up in the issue view
|
|
if _, _, err = SubmitReview(ctx, doer, gitRepo, issue, issues_model.ReviewTypeComment, "", latestCommitID, nil); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// NOTICE: if it's a pending review the notifications will not be fired until user submit review.
|
|
|
|
return comment, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID creates a plain code comment at the specified line / path
|
|
func CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository,
|
|
issue *issues_model.Issue, content, treePath, beforeCommitID, afterCommitID string,
|
|
line, extraLinesCount, reviewID int64, attachments []string,
|
|
) (*issues_model.Comment, error) {
|
|
var commitID, blamedCommitID, patch string
|
|
blamedLine := line
|
|
if err := issue.LoadPullRequest(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("LoadPullRequest: %w", err)
|
|
}
|
|
pr := issue.PullRequest
|
|
if err := pr.LoadBaseRepo(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("LoadBaseRepo: %w", err)
|
|
}
|
|
gitRepo, closer, err := gitrepo.RepositoryFromContextOrOpen(ctx, pr.BaseRepo)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("RepositoryFromContextOrOpen: %w", err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer closer.Close()
|
|
|
|
invalidated := false
|
|
head := pr.GetGitRefName()
|
|
if line > 0 {
|
|
if reviewID != 0 {
|
|
first, err := issues_model.FindComments(ctx, &issues_model.FindCommentsOptions{
|
|
ReviewID: reviewID,
|
|
Line: line,
|
|
TreePath: treePath,
|
|
Type: issues_model.CommentTypeCode,
|
|
ListOptions: db.ListOptions{
|
|
PageSize: 1,
|
|
Page: 1,
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
if err == nil && len(first) > 0 {
|
|
commitID = first[0].CommitSHA
|
|
invalidated = first[0].Invalidated
|
|
patch = first[0].Patch
|
|
} else if err != nil && !issues_model.IsErrCommentNotExist(err) {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("Find first comment for %d line %d path %s. Error: %w", reviewID, line, treePath, err)
|
|
} else {
|
|
review, err := issues_model.GetReviewByID(ctx, reviewID)
|
|
if err == nil && len(review.CommitID) > 0 {
|
|
head = review.CommitID
|
|
} else if err != nil && !issues_model.IsErrReviewNotExist(err) {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("GetReviewByID %d. Error: %w", reviewID, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(commitID) == 0 {
|
|
// FIXME validate treePath
|
|
// Get latest commit referencing the commented line
|
|
// No need for get commit for base branch changes
|
|
commit, lineres, err := gitRepo.LineBlame(afterCommitID, treePath, uint64(line))
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
blamedCommitID = commit.ID.String()
|
|
blamedLine = int64(lineres)
|
|
} else if !errors.Is(err, git.ErrBlameFileDoesNotExist) && !errors.Is(err, git.ErrBlameFileNotEnoughLines) {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("LineBlame[%s, %s, %s, %d]: %w", pr.GetGitRefName(), gitRepo.Path, treePath, line, err)
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
blamedCommitID = commitID
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Commenting on a line that was removed. In this case, what we want to track in the comment is which line of
|
|
// code was this, in the last commit that the line of code actually existed in. We'll use a reverse git blame to
|
|
// identify this, from the PR base -> commit being viewed.
|
|
blame, err := gitRepo.ReverseLineBlame(beforeCommitID, treePath, uint64(-1*line), afterCommitID)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("ReverseLineBlame[%s, %s, %d, %s]: %w", beforeCommitID, treePath, -1*line, afterCommitID, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Convert to a right-hand (proposed) comment only when EVERY line of the range still exists at head
|
|
// (whole selection unchanged); if any line was removed or modified, keep it on the previous side.
|
|
rangeStillExists := blame.CommitID == afterCommitID
|
|
for i := int64(1); rangeStillExists && i <= extraLinesCount; i++ {
|
|
lineBlame, err := gitRepo.ReverseLineBlame(beforeCommitID, treePath, uint64(-1*line)+uint64(i), afterCommitID)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("ReverseLineBlame[%s, %s, %d, %s]: %w", beforeCommitID, treePath, -1*line+i, afterCommitID, err)
|
|
}
|
|
if lineBlame.CommitID != afterCommitID {
|
|
rangeStillExists = false
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
switch {
|
|
case rangeStillExists:
|
|
commit, lineres, err := gitRepo.LineBlame(afterCommitID, treePath, blame.LineNumber)
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
blamedCommitID = commit.ID.String()
|
|
blamedLine = int64(lineres)
|
|
} else if !errors.Is(err, git.ErrBlameFileDoesNotExist) && !errors.Is(err, git.ErrBlameFileNotEnoughLines) {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("LineBlame[%s, %s, %s, %d]: %w", pr.GetGitRefName(), gitRepo.Path, treePath, line, err)
|
|
}
|
|
case blame.CommitID == afterCommitID:
|
|
// First line still exists but a later one changed
|
|
blamedCommitID = beforeCommitID
|
|
// retain negative line numbering to identify we're commenting on the "previous" side of the diff
|
|
blamedLine = line
|
|
default:
|
|
blamedCommitID = blame.CommitID
|
|
// retain negative line numbering to identify we're commenting on the "previous" side of the diff
|
|
blamedLine = -1 * int64(blame.LineNumber)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Only fetch diff if comment is review comment
|
|
if len(patch) == 0 && reviewID != 0 {
|
|
if len(commitID) == 0 {
|
|
commitID, err = gitRepo.GetRefCommitID(head)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("GetRefCommitID[%s]: %w", head, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if len(blamedCommitID) == 0 {
|
|
blamedCommitID = commitID
|
|
}
|
|
reader, writer := io.Pipe()
|
|
defer func() {
|
|
_ = reader.Close()
|
|
_ = writer.Close()
|
|
}()
|
|
go func() {
|
|
if err := git.GetRepoRawDiffForFile(gitRepo, beforeCommitID, afterCommitID, git.RawDiffNormal, treePath, writer); err != nil {
|
|
_ = writer.CloseWithError(fmt.Errorf("GetRawDiffForLine[%s, %s, %s, %s]: %w", gitRepo.Path, pr.MergeBase, afterCommitID, treePath, err))
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
_ = writer.Close()
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
// For multi-line comments, center the patch on the last line and expand context to include the full range
|
|
displayLine := int64((&issues_model.Comment{Line: line, ExtraLinesCount: extraLinesCount}).UnsignedDisplayLine())
|
|
contextLines := setting.UI.CodeCommentLines + int(extraLinesCount)
|
|
patch, err = git.CutDiffAroundLine(reader, displayLine, line < 0, contextLines)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
// The anchored commit may be gone (e.g. force-push before a migration), so the hunk
|
|
// can't be produced. Store the comment without context, like the importer.
|
|
log.Warn("CreateCodeComment: storing comment without diff context: %v", err)
|
|
patch = ""
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return issues_model.CreateComment(ctx, &issues_model.CreateCommentOptions{
|
|
Type: issues_model.CommentTypeCode,
|
|
Doer: doer,
|
|
Repo: repo,
|
|
Issue: issue,
|
|
Content: content,
|
|
LineNum: blamedLine,
|
|
ExtraLinesCount: extraLinesCount,
|
|
TreePath: treePath,
|
|
CommitSHA: blamedCommitID,
|
|
ReviewID: reviewID,
|
|
Patch: patch,
|
|
Invalidated: invalidated,
|
|
Attachments: attachments,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// SubmitReview creates a review out of the existing pending review or creates a new one if no pending review exist
|
|
func SubmitReview(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, gitRepo *git.Repository, issue *issues_model.Issue, reviewType issues_model.ReviewType, content, commitID string, attachmentUUIDs []string) (*issues_model.Review, *issues_model.Comment, error) {
|
|
if err := issue.LoadPullRequest(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pr := issue.PullRequest
|
|
var stale bool
|
|
if reviewType != issues_model.ReviewTypeApprove && reviewType != issues_model.ReviewTypeReject {
|
|
stale = false
|
|
} else {
|
|
headCommitID, err := gitRepo.GetRefCommitID(pr.GetGitRefName())
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if headCommitID == commitID {
|
|
stale = false
|
|
} else {
|
|
testPatchCtx, err := getTestPatchCtx(ctx, pr, true)
|
|
defer testPatchCtx.close()
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
stale, err = testPatchCtx.gitRepo.CheckIfDiffDiffers(testPatchCtx.baseRev, commitID, headCommitID, testPatchCtx.env)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("CheckIfDiffDiffers: %w", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
review, comm, err := issues_model.SubmitReview(ctx, doer, issue, reviewType, content, commitID, stale, attachmentUUIDs)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mentions, err := issues_model.FindAndUpdateIssueMentions(ctx, issue, doer, comm.Content)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
notify_service.PullRequestReview(ctx, pr, review, comm, mentions)
|
|
|
|
for _, lines := range review.CodeComments {
|
|
for _, comments := range lines {
|
|
for _, codeComment := range comments {
|
|
mentions, err := issues_model.FindAndUpdateIssueMentions(ctx, issue, doer, codeComment.Content)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
notify_service.PullRequestCodeComment(ctx, pr, codeComment, mentions)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return review, comm, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// DismissApprovalReviews dismiss all approval reviews because of new commits
|
|
func DismissApprovalReviews(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, pull *issues_model.PullRequest) error {
|
|
reviews, err := issues_model.FindReviews(ctx, issues_model.FindReviewOptions{
|
|
ListOptions: db.ListOptionsAll,
|
|
IssueID: pull.IssueID,
|
|
Types: []issues_model.ReviewType{issues_model.ReviewTypeApprove},
|
|
Dismissed: optional.Some(false),
|
|
})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if err := reviews.LoadIssues(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return db.WithTx(ctx, func(ctx context.Context) error {
|
|
for _, review := range reviews {
|
|
if err := issues_model.DismissReview(ctx, review, true); err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
comment, err := issues_model.CreateComment(ctx, &issues_model.CreateCommentOptions{
|
|
Doer: doer,
|
|
Content: "New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings",
|
|
Type: issues_model.CommentTypeDismissReview,
|
|
ReviewID: review.ID,
|
|
Issue: review.Issue,
|
|
Repo: review.Issue.Repo,
|
|
})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
comment.Review = review
|
|
comment.Poster = doer
|
|
comment.Issue = review.Issue
|
|
|
|
notify_service.PullReviewDismiss(ctx, doer, review, comment)
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// DismissReview dismissing stale review by repo admin
|
|
func DismissReview(ctx context.Context, reviewID, repoID int64, message string, doer *user_model.User, isDismiss, dismissPriors bool) (comment *issues_model.Comment, err error) {
|
|
review, err := issues_model.GetReviewByID(ctx, reviewID)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if review.Type != issues_model.ReviewTypeApprove && review.Type != issues_model.ReviewTypeReject {
|
|
return nil, errors.New("not need to dismiss this review because it's type is not Approve or change request")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// load data for notify
|
|
if err := review.LoadAttributes(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check if the review's repoID is the one we're currently expecting.
|
|
if review.Issue.RepoID != repoID {
|
|
return nil, errors.New("reviews's repository is not the same as the one we expect")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
issue := review.Issue
|
|
|
|
if issue.IsClosed {
|
|
return nil, ErrDismissRequestOnClosedPR{}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if issue.IsPull {
|
|
if err := issue.LoadPullRequest(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
if issue.PullRequest.HasMerged {
|
|
return nil, ErrDismissRequestOnClosedPR{}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if err := issues_model.DismissReview(ctx, review, isDismiss); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if dismissPriors {
|
|
reviews, err := issues_model.FindReviews(ctx, issues_model.FindReviewOptions{
|
|
IssueID: review.IssueID,
|
|
ReviewerID: review.ReviewerID,
|
|
Dismissed: optional.Some(false),
|
|
})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
for _, oldReview := range reviews {
|
|
if err = issues_model.DismissReview(ctx, oldReview, true); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !isDismiss {
|
|
return nil, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if err := review.Issue.LoadAttributes(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
comment, err = issues_model.CreateComment(ctx, &issues_model.CreateCommentOptions{
|
|
Doer: doer,
|
|
Content: message,
|
|
Type: issues_model.CommentTypeDismissReview,
|
|
ReviewID: review.ID,
|
|
Issue: review.Issue,
|
|
Repo: review.Issue.Repo,
|
|
})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
comment.Review = review
|
|
comment.Poster = doer
|
|
comment.Issue = review.Issue
|
|
|
|
notify_service.PullReviewDismiss(ctx, doer, review, comment)
|
|
|
|
return comment, nil
|
|
}
|